PRACTICE AREA

Ozempic and GLP-1 Claims in Los Angeles

Claims involving Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro and related weight loss and diabetes drugs, reviewed from a downtown Los Angeles office.

How an Ozempic lawsuit works.

If you developed gastroparesis, a bowel obstruction or severe, repeated vomiting after taking Ozempic or another GLP-1 drug, you may be looking for an Ozempic lawsuit lawyer in Los Angeles. Broukhim Legal PC reviews GLP-1 claims for people across Los Angeles County and California, and attorney Bejan Broukhim personally reviews each case.

On this page: Key takeaways · Why choose Broukhim Legal PC · Who may have a claim · What the lawsuits allege · What records to gather · Deadlines to file · What compensation may be sought · What a lawyer costs · Related claims and locations

Key takeaways

  • Federal GLP-1 claims are consolidated in MDL 3094 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The drugs involved include semaglutide (Ozempic, Wegovy, Rybelsus) and tirzepatide (Mounjaro, Zepbound).
  • The conditions most often described are gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction and severe recurrent vomiting. A separate federal proceeding concerns claims of vision loss.
  • These are allegations in active litigation. The manufacturers deny them and causation is contested, so using the drug does not by itself mean you have a case.
  • What decides a review is proof of use and a documented diagnosis. Both can often be rebuilt from pharmacy, insurer, clinic and hospital records.
  • California generally allows two years to file an injury lawsuit. Broukhim Legal PC takes these cases with no fee unless we recover for you.

Why choose Broukhim Legal PC for your Ozempic and GLP-1 case?

  • Records first. These cases turn on what a clinician recorded and when, so the review is a records review before it is anything else, and the lawyer reviewing it is the lawyer handling your case.
  • Direct access to your lawyer. Bejan Broukhim personally reviews your case and leads its strategy. You can speak directly with him about your case, and if another law firm is ever brought in, that happens only with your written consent.
  • Years of experience, fully licensed. Bejan Broukhim brings years of experience in California personal injury and mass tort law and holds an active California law license, State Bar number 183036.
  • Straight talk about the litigation. Claims are reviewed for the individual, not sold as a foregone conclusion, and you hear plainly what is contested.
  • No fee unless we recover for you. You pay nothing up front, and if nothing is recovered you owe no fee.
  • Ready for court. Every case is prepared from day one as though it will go to trial, so any settlement offer is measured against a case that is ready to be tried.

Who may have an Ozempic or GLP-1 claim?

Medical records decide these cases. Not how unwell someone felt, and not how long they took the drug, but what a clinician recorded and when. Two things matter most: that your use of the drug can be shown, and that a medical diagnosis supports the injury. If you have neither in hand today it is still worth asking, because both can often be reconstructed.

The diagnosis side usually looks like one of the following:

  • A gastroparesis diagnosis, sometimes called stomach paralysis, or a gastric emptying study that supports it.
  • An endoscopy or other test taken to explain severe vomiting or pain.
  • An emergency admission for obstruction or ileus, with the hospital discharge summary.
  • Repeated emergency visits for vomiting and pain where you were sent home without a name for what was wrong. The full chart from each visit can change a case.

The drugs covered by the claims include Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, Zepbound, Saxenda and Victoza. Nothing here means everyone who used one of them has a case, and nobody can responsibly promise you an outcome.

What do Ozempic lawsuits allege?

The lawsuits allege that the manufacturers knew, or should have known, of a risk of severe gastrointestinal injury and failed to warn patients and prescribers adequately. The conditions most often described in the filings are gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction, ileus and severe recurrent vomiting, and there are separate claims of vision loss.

Those are allegations in active litigation. The manufacturers deny them, causation is contested, and nothing has been established against them. Anyone telling you the outcome is a foregone conclusion is telling you something they do not know.

This is not a class action. Each claim stays separate, built on that individual’s own records, with their own outcome.

What records should you gather for an Ozempic claim?

The prescription history matters just as much as the diagnosis: which drug, prescribed by whom, over what period, and whether it was prescribed for diabetes or for weight loss. Many people got these medicines from a weight loss clinic, through telemedicine, from a compounding pharmacy or even from another country, and have no prescription or paperwork. Use can still be shown with:

  • Pharmacy history and records from your insurer or Medi-Cal.
  • The clinic file and emails from a telemedicine platform.
  • Receipts and bank transfers, and the boxes and pens if you still have them. Do not throw anything away.
  • Hospital and specialist records for every visit, including gastric emptying studies, endoscopies and discharge summaries.

A review will also ask about other medical conditions, other medicines and any earlier stomach or bowel problems, because the manufacturers can be expected to point to them. Compounded semaglutide obtained from a pharmacy or a clinic rather than a manufacturer raises different questions, because the defendant may not be the same. We request the medical records ourselves, in Spanish as well as English, and you pay nothing up front.

How long do you have to file an Ozempic lawsuit?

Under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1, an injury lawsuit in California generally has to be filed within two years. For injuries that appear later, the two years can run from when the injury and its likely cause were, or should have been, discovered. With a drug injury that date is often not the first day you took the medicine, and it is argued case by case. Have your date reviewed early rather than assuming time remains.

If the person who was hurt has died, Code of Civil Procedure section 377.60 sets out who may bring a wrongful death claim. The federal cases are consolidated rather than heard locally, so living anywhere in Los Angeles County does not limit the claim.

What compensation may be sought in an Ozempic case?

  • Medical expenses, past and future, including hospital admissions, procedures and ongoing care.
  • Lost earnings and loss of earning capacity.
  • Pain, suffering and emotional distress, including the loss of enjoyment of daily life.
  • Punitive damages under Civil Code section 3294 where the evidence shows malice, oppression or fraud.
  • Wrongful death damages for the family where a patient has died.

What a claim is worth cannot be known before the records are reviewed. It turns on the diagnosis, the treatment and the proof of use.

How much does an Ozempic lawyer cost in Los Angeles?

No fee unless there is a recovery. Broukhim Legal PC takes Ozempic and GLP-1 cases on a contingency fee, so there is nothing to pay up front and the fee is paid out of what is recovered. If nothing is recovered, no fee is owed. The fee agreement is put in writing and signed before any work starts, as California law requires, and it also explains how the costs of running the case are handled. Your first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation.

Related claims and where we help

Other medicines where the warning rather than the drug is the issue are reviewed on the same basis, including Depo-Provera and meningioma and Suboxone dental decay. Broukhim Legal PC is at 550 S Hill Street in downtown Los Angeles, and a claim is reviewed before anything is filed. See all mass tort cases and the locations we serve, or tell us what happened for a free case review.

Meet your Los Angeles Ozempic lawsuit lawyer

Bejan Broukhim, personal injury lawyer at Broukhim Legal PC

Bejan Broukhim, Founder and Lead Attorney
State Bar of California, license number 183036

Bejan Broukhim brings years of California legal experience to injury and mass tort cases and personally reviews each one. He earned his J.D. at the University of West Los Angeles School of Law, served as a judicial extern in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Van Nuys Superior Court, and appeared in preliminary hearings as a certified law clerk with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office. Every case is prepared from day one as though it will go to trial.

Office: 550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390, Los Angeles, CA 90013, serving all of Los Angeles County and California. Get directions

GLP-1 injuries we review in Los Angeles

HOW IT WORKS

Our process.

1

Consultation

A confidential first conversation. We review the facts, tell you where you stand, and set out the realistic options.

2

Strategy

Scope and fees agreed in writing, then a plan built from day one as if the matter will go to trial.

3

Resolution

We negotiate from a position of strength, and litigate aggressively when that is what your interests require.

FREE CASE REVIEW

See if a claim can be reviewed.

Takes 30 seconds. Confidential, and no obligation.

Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney-client relationship. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.

COMMON QUESTIONS

GLP-1 claims, answered plainly.

Nobody can answer that from a conversation, and you should be wary of anyone who does. These claims are assessed on records: which drug, over what period, and what a clinician diagnosed and documented. The honest process is to collect the records, review them against the criteria the litigation is using, and tell you plainly whether it proceeds. Sometimes the answer is no, and you are told that rather than signed up.

No. An MDL groups cases before one judge so that the shared questions, expert evidence, document production and general causation, are handled once instead of thousands of times. Your claim stays yours. It is not merged, the recovery is not divided among a class, and there is no coupon at the end.

It depends on when the injury was diagnosed and when the connection to the drug was or reasonably should have been discovered, which is why a single date cannot be given here honestly. California’s discovery rules can extend the usual period in pharmaceutical cases, and other circumstances shorten it. Have the dates assessed against your actual records early.

The first conversation costs nothing, is confidential and carries no obligation. It usually runs about half an hour: which drug you took and over what period, whether it was prescribed for diabetes or for weight loss, what a clinician diagnosed, and which records already exist. If the records do not support a claim you are told that plainly and nothing further happens. If they do, the matter is taken on a contingency fee, so there is nothing to pay up front and the fee is paid out of what is recovered. If there is no recovery, no fee is owed. The fee agreement is put in writing and signed before any work starts, which is what California law requires, and the costs of running the case are explained in that same agreement.

It matters a great deal, because it can change who the defendant is. Compounded semaglutide obtained through a pharmacy, a med spa or an online clinic does not come from the manufacturers named in the MDL, and the claim may run against the compounder or the prescriber instead. Bring whatever you have: packaging, receipts, the clinic name, and the pharmacy records.

Not necessarily. What usually matters is when the injury was diagnosed and when the link to the drug was identified, rather than when you last took it. Several of these conditions are diagnosed well after a patient stops. That said, time is never on the claimant’s side, so it is worth having the dates assessed rather than assuming.

You will be asked for the specifics: the drugs, the dates, your prescribing and treating clinicians, and authorisation to collect your records. Those records are reviewed against the litigation’s criteria and you are told candidly whether the claim proceeds. If it does, it is filed and joins the coordinated proceedings, where much of what follows is common to all claimants and requires nothing from you. Quiet periods are normal, and you should expect to be told where things stand rather than having to ask.

General information about California law, not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by reading it. Deadlines and outcomes turn on the facts of your own matter, so have yours reviewed. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.

READY TO BEGIN?

Talk to Bejan Broukhim.

Stand up to corporate negligence. Contact the firm’s mass tort team for a free, confidential case evaluation.

FREE CONSULTATION

Tell us about your matter.

A short, confidential review. We will tell you plainly whether there is something worth pursuing.

Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney–client relationship.