Claims involving talc-based body powders, reviewed from a downtown Los Angeles office by attorney Bejan Broukhim.
If you or someone in your family used talc-based body powder for years and was later diagnosed with ovarian cancer or mesothelioma, you may be looking for a talcum powder lawsuit lawyer in Los Angeles. Broukhim Legal PC reviews talc claims for people across Los Angeles County and California, and attorney Bejan Broukhim personally reviews each case.
On this page: Key takeaways · Why choose Broukhim Legal PC · Who may have a claim · What the lawsuits allege · What records to gather · Deadlines to file · What compensation may be sought · What a lawyer costs · Related claims and locations
What a review turns on is the same as in any product case: the diagnosis and the product history.
The diagnosis side is the firmer of the two. Ovarian cancer or mesothelioma documented by a clinician, with the pathology report and the treating oncologist’s records, is what the litigation works from. Self-reported symptoms are not enough and nobody should suggest otherwise.
The product history is harder, and that is expected. Talc use typically ran for decades, often beginning in adolescence, and few people kept receipts for a bathroom product. In many homes talc was part of the daily routine for generations: for babies, for sweat, for feet, after the bath. Daily exposure over twenty, thirty or forty years is the profile these cases describe.
Mesothelioma is what surprises people most. It is a cancer everyone associates with work involving asbestos, and when it is diagnosed in a woman who never set foot on a construction site, nobody explains where it could have come from. Contaminated talc is one of the routes this litigation has pointed to.
The lawsuits allege that talc-based body powders, including baby powder, were contaminated with asbestos, that long use is linked to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, and that the manufacturers knew of the risk and failed to warn. These remain allegations in contested litigation. The manufacturers deny them and the science has been argued on both sides for years.
Federal talc claims are consolidated in MDL 2738 in the District of New Jersey, with tens of thousands of claims pending.
One thing you should know before anything else. A proposed settlement in this litigation was announced in 2026 and is not final. Proposed settlements in proceedings this size take time, are often contested, and can be restructured or rejected. In practice that means timing carries more weight than usual here, and nobody can responsibly tell you what a claim will be worth or whether a given deadline will remain open.
This is not a class action. Each claim stays separate, with its own records and its own outcome.
Two things are needed for a review: which product was used and for how long, and the diagnosis with its pathology report.
Under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1, an injury lawsuit in California generally has to be filed within two years. For diseases that appear years after exposure, the two years can run from when the injury and its likely cause were, or should have been, discovered, so the date of diagnosis can matter. Because a proposed settlement is pending but not final, have your date reviewed early rather than assuming time remains.
If the person has already died, the case can still exist. Families have set it aside because the diagnosis was years ago or because the mother has passed away, and it is better to ask before assuming. California allows two separate claims. One is for the wrongful death, which belongs to close relatives under Code of Civil Procedure section 377.60, and the other is for what the person suffered and spent before dying, which the estate brings.
What a claim is worth cannot be known before the records are reviewed, and in this litigation the pending settlement adds another reason for caution.
No fee unless there is a recovery. Broukhim Legal PC takes talcum powder cases on a contingency fee, so there is nothing to pay up front and the fee is paid out of what is recovered. If nothing is recovered, no fee is owed. The fee agreement is put in writing and signed before any work starts, as California law requires, and it also explains how the costs of running the case are handled. Your first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation.
Other long-use consumer product claims are reviewed on the same basis, including chemical hair relaxers and Depo-Provera and meningioma. These cases are consolidated in federal or state court rather than heard locally, so where you live in Los Angeles County does not limit the claim. See all mass tort cases and the locations we serve, or tell us about your diagnosis for a free case review.

Bejan Broukhim, Founder and Lead Attorney
State Bar of California, license number 183036
Bejan Broukhim brings years of California legal experience to injury and mass tort cases and personally reviews each one. He earned his J.D. at the University of West Los Angeles School of Law, served as a judicial extern in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Van Nuys Superior Court, and appeared in preliminary hearings as a certified law clerk with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office. Every case is prepared from day one as though it will go to trial.
Office: 550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390, Los Angeles, CA 90013, serving all of Los Angeles County and California. Get directions
A confidential first conversation. We review the facts, tell you where you stand, and set out the realistic options.
Scope and fees agreed in writing, then a plan built from day one as if the matter will go to trial.
We negotiate from a position of strength, and litigate aggressively when that is what your interests require.
Takes 30 seconds. Confidential, and no obligation.
Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney-client relationship. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.
A proposed settlement was announced in 2026 and it is not final. Proposals in proceedings of this size are frequently contested, modified or rejected, and the terms that ultimately apply, including who is eligible and by when, are not fixed until a court approves them. What that means for you is that timing matters more here than in most litigations, and that anyone telling you the window is definitely open, or definitely closed, is guessing. It is worth asking now rather than waiting to see.
No. An MDL groups cases before one judge so the shared questions are handled once instead of tens of thousands of times. Each claim stays separate, built on that person’s own diagnosis and history. A proposed settlement within an MDL is also not the same thing as a class settlement, which is part of why these proposals take so long to resolve.
It depends on when the diagnosis was made and when the possible connection to talc was or reasonably should have been discovered, and in this litigation it may also depend on where the settlement process lands. A single date cannot be given honestly on a web page. Have it assessed against your actual records, and do it sooner rather than later given where the proceeding is.
It rests on a diagnosis and a product history. Ovarian cancer or mesothelioma documented by a clinician, with the pathology report and the treating oncologist’s records, is what the litigation works from, and that is the part checked first. The product side can be approximate: the years talc was used, roughly how often, and for what purpose. Nobody is asked for receipts from decades ago. Where the records do not support a claim you are told that rather than signed up. The first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation, and the scope of the work and the fees are agreed in writing before anything starts.
That is normal and expected. Talc use usually ran for decades and began long before anyone had reason to keep a record. Approximate periods, frequency and whatever brands come to mind are enough to begin. Family members often remember what was in the house, and that recollection counts for more than people assume.
It does not automatically, but it will certainly be raised by the defence, which is exactly why it is better identified at the start than discovered later. Occupational and household asbestos exposure is a standard line of argument in mesothelioma cases in particular. Being upfront about it allows the claim to be assessed realistically rather than optimistically.
Possibly. A claim may be brought by the estate, and separately by qualifying family members under California’s wrongful death provisions. The records needed are the same: the diagnosis, the pathology, the treatment history and whatever product history the family can reconstruct. Those deadlines run on their own clock, so it is worth asking sooner.
General information about California law, not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by reading it. Deadlines and outcomes turn on the facts of your own matter, so have yours reviewed. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.
Stand up to corporate negligence. Contact the firm’s mass tort team for a free, confidential case evaluation.
Broukhim Legal PC. Personal injury and mass tort litigation, led by Bejan Broukhim from downtown Los Angeles.
Our Firm
Bejan Broukhim
FAQ
Insights
Contact
Broukhim Legal PC
550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM PT
Attorney advertising. This website is an advertisement by Broukhim Legal PC, 550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390, Los Angeles, CA 90013. The attorney responsible for its content is Bejan Broukhim, State Bar of California license number 183036, licensed in California. The information on this website is general information, not legal advice, and is no substitute for advice about your own situation. Contacting the firm or submitting a form does not create an attorney-client relationship, so please do not send confidential information until the firm has agreed in writing to represent you. Every case is different, and no particular result is promised or implied. Contingency fees and costs: no attorney fee is charged unless there is a recovery. Case costs, such as filing fees, records and expert witness fees, are separate from the fee, and whether you would be responsible for them if there is no recovery is set out in the written fee agreement you review before signing. With your written consent, the firm may associate with or refer your matter to another law firm; any division of fees is disclosed to you in writing and does not increase the total fee. Images on this website are illustrative and, other than Bejan Broukhim, do not depict clients or lawyers of the firm. If a medication or medical device is mentioned on this website, do not stop taking it or have it removed without first talking to your doctor.
© 2026 Broukhim Legal PC. All rights reserved. · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
A short, confidential review. We will tell you plainly whether there is something worth pursuing.
Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney–client relationship.