PRACTICE AREA

Video Game Addiction Claims in Los Angeles

Compulsive gaming in a child or young adult, reviewed from a downtown Los Angeles office by attorney Bejan Broukhim.

How a Los Angeles video game addiction claim works.

If your child or young adult developed compulsive gaming and you can document what followed, you may want a video game addiction lawyer in Los Angeles who will read the records, look at how the game was built and tell you plainly where the claim stands. Broukhim Legal PC reviews video game addiction claims for families across Los Angeles County and California, and attorney Bejan Broukhim personally reviews each matter.

On this page: Key takeaways · Why choose Broukhim Legal PC · What to do first · What the lawsuits allege · Records to gather · Deadlines to file · What compensation may be sought · What a video game addiction lawyer costs · Mass tort claims across Los Angeles County

Key takeaways

  • These claims are not about a child who plays too much. They are about games alleged to be engineered to be hard to stop, and the documented harm that followed.
  • If a child is struggling now, the first call is to their doctor or a mental health professional, not a law firm. Treatment helps, and it also creates the records a claim needs.
  • Do not delete the account or the billing history. Card and platform statements are among the most concrete evidence in these files.
  • California Code of Civil Procedure section 352 pauses the clock while a claimant is under eighteen, so a young person generally has until two years after their eighteenth birthday. A parent’s own claim for money paid is governed by different rules.
  • This is not a class action. Each claim stays separate and rests on that young person’s own history and records.
  • Broukhim Legal PC takes these cases on a contingency fee: nothing up front, and no fee unless we recover for you.

Why choose Broukhim Legal PC for your video game addiction case?

  • Direct access to your lawyer. Bejan Broukhim personally reviews your case and leads its strategy. You can speak directly with him about your matter, and if another law firm is ever brought in, that happens only with your written consent.
  • Years of experience, fully licensed. Bejan Broukhim brings years of experience in California injury and mass tort law and holds an active California law license, State Bar number 183036.
  • Told plainly. Heavy play on its own is not an injury, and you are told so. A review tells you honestly which side of that line your records fall on.
  • Records first. We look for the clinician’s assessment, school records, treatment notes and billing history, and request account data from the publisher rather than reconstructing it.
  • No fee unless we recover for you. You pay nothing up front, and if nothing is recovered you owe no fee.
  • Ready for court. Every case is prepared from day one as though it will go to trial.

What should you do first if your child is struggling with gaming?

  1. Talk to your child’s doctor or a mental health professional. That is the thing that helps, and nothing here substitutes for it. A claim can only be reviewed after the fact.
  2. Keep every billing statement and do not delete the account. The history shows how much was spent, how often the game asked for money and what hours the young person was playing.
  3. Note what changed and when: sleep, meals, friendships, school attendance and family life.
  4. Ask about the account data. Play-time data can often be requested from the publisher.
  5. Contact us for a free, confidential review once treatment is under way. Patterns we review include a clinical assessment, school collapse, treatment that was needed, heavy in-game spending and use that began before eighteen.

What do video game addiction lawsuits allege?

The design is the allegation. These claims are about games engineered to be hard to stop playing, and about what that engineering is alleged to have done to young people. The mechanics at the centre of the cases are specific:

  • Reward schedules that pay out unpredictably.
  • Loot boxes and randomised rewards bought with real money.
  • Battle passes and daily streaks that punish a day away.
  • Matchmaking tuned to keep a session going, and social pressure built into the game loop.

The allegation is that these were designed and tested to maximise time and spending by minors, that the risk of compulsive use was understood internally, and that parents were not warned. The World Health Organization recognises gaming disorder in ICD-11, which is part of the medical framework these claims are built on. A claim generally alleges defective design, negligence and failure to warn. Those are allegations to be proved. Games are lawful products and most people play them without harm, which is why each claim is assessed on its own evidence.

Under California’s pure comparative fault rule, partial fault reduces a recovery and does not bar it. Where a company acted with malice, oppression or fraud, Civil Code section 3294 allows punitive damages.

What records should you gather for a gaming addiction claim?

  • A clinician’s assessment of compulsive gaming or gaming disorder.
  • School records showing attendance, grades or behaviour falling away.
  • Therapy, inpatient or hospital records.
  • Card and platform billing history for in-game spending.
  • Account data showing play time, and the ordinary family record of what changed and when.

Purchases made by a minor also raise separate questions under California consumer law, which are reviewed alongside the injury claim. Many parents arrive through the card first, with charges nobody recognised. That is part of the case and can also be pursued separately with the platform and the bank.

How long do you have to file a video game addiction claim?

Longer than most claims. California Code of Civil Procedure section 352 pauses the limitation period while a claimant is under eighteen, so a young person generally has until two years after their eighteenth birthday to bring a claim in their own name. The general rule for a personal injury suit is two years under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1, and the delayed discovery rule can start that period when the injury and its likely cause were, or should have been, discovered. A parent’s own claim for money they paid is governed by different rules, as is any claim involving a public entity, which carries a six month claim deadline under Government Code section 911.2. Ask about both the young person’s claim and your own.

What compensation may be sought in a gaming addiction case?

  • Medical and treatment expenses, including therapy, inpatient programs and hospital care.
  • In-game spending charged to a parent’s card.
  • Lost education and earning capacity where school or work fell away.
  • Pain, suffering and emotional distress, and the loss of enjoyment of life.
  • Punitive damages under Civil Code section 3294 where the facts show malice, oppression or fraud.

No outcome can be promised, and the value of a claim cannot be known before the medical picture and the evidence are clear. This is not a class action. Where a coordinated proceeding exists, a filed claim joins it, and each family keeps its own case and its own valuation.

How much does a video game addiction lawyer cost in Los Angeles?

No fee unless there is a recovery. Broukhim Legal PC takes injury and mass tort matters on a contingency fee, so there is nothing to pay up front and the fee is paid out of what is recovered. If nothing is recovered, no fee is owed. The fee agreement is put in writing and signed before any work starts, as Business and Professions Code section 6147 requires, and the costs of running the case are explained in that same agreement. The first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation.

Video game addiction claims for families across Los Angeles County

Broukhim Legal PC takes mass tort claims for clients throughout Los Angeles County from its office at 550 S Hill Street in downtown Los Angeles. These cases are consolidated in federal or state court rather than heard locally, so where you live does not limit the claim. Related claims about platform design are reviewed through our social media harm practice. See all mass torts we review, or choose your city:

See all locations we serve, or tell us about your family’s situation for a free case review.

Meet your Los Angeles video game addiction lawyer

Bejan Broukhim, personal injury lawyer at Broukhim Legal PC

Bejan Broukhim, Founder and Lead Attorney
State Bar of California, license number 183036

Bejan Broukhim brings years of California legal experience to injury and mass tort cases and personally reviews each one. He earned his J.D. at the University of West Los Angeles School of Law, served as a judicial extern in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Van Nuys Superior Court, and appeared in preliminary hearings as a certified law clerk with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office. Every case is prepared from day one as though it will go to trial.

Office: 550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390, Los Angeles, CA 90013, serving all of Los Angeles County and California. Get directions

Video game addiction patterns we review in Los Angeles

HOW IT WORKS

Our process.

1

Consultation

A confidential first conversation. We review the facts, tell you where you stand, and set out the realistic options.

2

Strategy

Scope and fees agreed in writing, then a plan built from day one as if the matter will go to trial.

3

Resolution

We negotiate from a position of strength, and litigate aggressively when that is what your interests require.

FREE CASE REVIEW

See if a claim can be reviewed.

Takes 30 seconds. Confidential, and no obligation.

Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney-client relationship. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Gaming claims, answered plainly.

On its own, no, and you should be told that plainly. Heavy play is not an injury. These claims turn on documented harm, such as a clinical assessment, treatment, school collapse or significant financial loss, together with the design features alleged to have driven it. A review will tell you honestly which side of that line your records fall on.

Talk to your child’s doctor or a mental health professional. That is the thing that helps, and nothing here is a substitute for it. It also creates the records a claim would later need. Keep the billing statements and do not delete the account.

Longer than most claims. California Code of Civil Procedure section 352 pauses the limitation period while a claimant is under eighteen, so a young person generally has until two years after their eighteenth birthday to bring a claim in their own name. A parent’s own claim for money they paid is governed by different rules, so ask about both.

The first conversation costs nothing, is confidential and carries no obligation. It covers which games and platforms were involved, roughly when the use escalated, what a clinician or the school recorded at the time, and how much was spent in-game. Billing statements and account data can then be requested rather than reconstructed, which is why the account should not be deleted. If the records do not show documented harm alongside the design features, you are told that and nothing further happens. If they do, the matter is taken on a contingency fee, so there is nothing to pay up front and the fee is paid out of what is recovered. If there is no recovery, no fee is owed. The fee agreement is put in writing and signed before any work starts, and the costs of running the case are explained in that same agreement.

It is a fair challenge and the defence makes it in every case. These claims do not allege that playing games is harmful. They allege that specific mechanics were designed and tested to produce compulsive use in children, that the companies understood it, and that they did not say so. That is an evidentiary question about internal design decisions, not an argument about households.

Keep every statement. Card and platform billing records are among the most concrete evidence in these files, because they show escalation with dates attached. Purchases made by a minor also raise separate questions under California consumer law, which are reviewed alongside the injury claim.

You will be asked for the specifics: which games and platforms, roughly when the pattern started and how it progressed, what professional help was sought, what it cost, and authorisation to collect the relevant records. Those records are reviewed and you are told candidly whether the claim proceeds. If it does, it is filed, and where a coordinated proceeding exists it joins that.

General information about California law, not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by reading it. Deadlines and outcomes turn on the facts of your own matter, so have yours reviewed. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.

READY TO BEGIN?

Talk to Bejan Broukhim.

Stand up to corporate negligence. Contact the firm’s mass tort team for a free, confidential case evaluation.

FREE CONSULTATION

Tell us about your matter.

A short, confidential review. We will tell you plainly whether there is something worth pursuing.

Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney–client relationship.