PRACTICE AREA

Hernia Mesh Claims in Los Angeles

Hernia mesh failure and revision surgery, reviewed from a downtown Los Angeles office by attorney Bejan Broukhim.

How a Los Angeles hernia mesh lawsuit works.

If a hernia repair had to be redone, or the mesh had to be taken out, you may want a hernia mesh lawyer in Los Angeles to review your records. Broukhim Legal PC reviews hernia mesh claims for people across Los Angeles County and California, and attorney Bejan Broukhim personally reviews each case.

On this page: Key takeaways · Why choose Broukhim Legal PC · Who may have a claim · What the lawsuits allege · Records to gather · Deadlines to file · What compensation may be sought · What a hernia mesh lawyer costs · Hernia mesh claims across Los Angeles

Key takeaways

  • A second operation to redo the repair or remove the mesh is the clearest sign a claim is worth reviewing.
  • A recall is not required. Mesh can be defectively designed, manufactured or sold with inadequate warnings without ever being recalled.
  • The records that decide these cases, such as the operative report and implant record, name the mesh and manufacturer, so request them early.
  • The injury often appears years after the repair. California’s discovery rules can affect when the two year period starts, but they are applied to the actual dates in your file.
  • This is not a class action. Each claim stays separate, and Broukhim Legal PC takes cases on a contingency fee, with no fee unless we recover for you.

Why choose Broukhim Legal PC for your hernia mesh case?

  • Direct access to your lawyer. Bejan Broukhim personally reviews your case and leads its strategy. You can speak directly with him about your case, and if another law firm is ever brought in, that happens only with your written consent.
  • Years of experience, fully licensed. Bejan Broukhim brings years of experience in California injury law and holds an active California law license, State Bar number 183036.
  • Records-first review. A hernia mesh claim is built from specific documents: the operative report, the implant record, the imaging and the revision report. The review starts there, not with assumptions.
  • Each claim built on your own facts. This is not a class action. Your mesh, your surgery and your outcome decide your case, and nothing is handled as a form claim.
  • No fee unless we recover for you. You pay nothing up front, and if nothing is recovered you owe no fee.
  • Ready for court. Every case is prepared from day one as though it will go to trial, so any settlement offer is measured against a case that is ready to be tried.

Who may have a hernia mesh claim?

The question to start with is whether the repair failed or caused new problems. People who may be worth reviewing include those who:

  • Had a revision or explant surgery to redo the repair or take out the mesh.
  • Have pain that did not go away, a bulge, repeated infections, a bowel obstruction or a fistula after a mesh repair.
  • Were told for years that pain was “normal after surgery” and later learned the mesh may be the cause.
  • Had a repair with polypropylene or coated mesh, including products sold by C. R. Bard and Davol, by Covidien, and by Atrium.

Most people hold back because their mesh was never recalled, and that is the wrong test. Almost nobody knows which mesh was used, which is normal: it is not information handed to the patient. The hospital has it in the operative report and the implant record, with brand, model and lot number.

What do hernia mesh lawsuits allege?

A recall is not an element of any claim. The allegations commonly concern the material shrinking, hardening, folding, migrating, adhering to the bowel, becoming infected or degrading inside the body. A claim generally alleges one or more of three things:

  • Design defect. The mesh was unreasonably dangerous as designed.
  • Manufacturing defect. This particular unit was made badly.
  • Failure to warn. The risks were known and not adequately communicated to the surgeon or to the patient.

Those are allegations to be proved, not assumptions. Product claims also work differently from a negligence claim, because the focus is on the product and what the manufacturer knew, not on a single mistake in the operating room.

What records should you gather for a hernia mesh claim?

The records that decide these cases are specific and usually obtainable. With a signed authorization, Broukhim Legal PC requests them for you, so that first step is not left to you:

  • The original operative report, which names the mesh and the manufacturer.
  • The product sticker or implant record held by the hospital, with brand, model and lot number.
  • The imaging that showed the recurrence, the adhesion or the obstruction.
  • The revision or explant operative report, and notes from each visit for pain.
  • The explanted mesh itself. Ask the hospital in writing to keep it: it is often held as a pathology specimen, and examining it can be the most valuable evidence in the case.

If the original surgery was many years ago, or in another country, the firm still reviews what can be obtained. If the hernia came from lifting at work and workers’ compensation paid for the surgery, a claim against the mesh manufacturer is still a separate path.

How long do you have to file a hernia mesh claim in California?

An injury lawsuit generally must be filed within two years under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1. Timing matters more here than in most claims, because the injury often appears years after the original repair. For injuries that appear later, the two years can run from when the injury and its likely cause were, or should have been, discovered. If you were told for years that your pain was normal, that can matter to the date. Because those rules are applied to the actual dates in your file and not to a rule of thumb, have your dates reviewed early rather than assuming time has run out.

What compensation may be sought in a hernia mesh claim?

No result can be promised, and what a claim is worth depends on the injury, the treatment and the proof. The categories of damages that may be sought include:

  • Medical expenses, past and future, including revision surgery and follow-up care.
  • Lost earnings and loss of earning capacity.
  • Pain, suffering and emotional distress, and the loss of enjoyment of life.
  • Punitive damages under Civil Code section 3294 where the evidence shows malice, oppression or fraud.

How much does a hernia mesh lawyer cost?

No fee unless there is a recovery. Broukhim Legal PC takes hernia mesh cases on a contingency fee, so there is nothing to pay up front and the fee is paid out of what is recovered. If nothing is recovered, no fee is owed. The fee agreement is put in writing and signed before any work starts, as California law requires, and it also explains how the costs of running the case are handled. Your first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation.

Hernia mesh claims across Los Angeles County

These cases are consolidated in federal or state court rather than heard locally, so where you live does not limit the claim. Broukhim Legal PC reviews them from its office at 550 S Hill Street in downtown Los Angeles. This is one of several implant claims the firm handles: port catheters, copper IUDs and other medical devices are reviewed on the same basis.

Mass tort claims are handled for clients across Los Angeles County and California, and where you live does not limit a claim that is part of consolidated litigation. Browse all mass tort cases we review or the locations we serve, or tell us about your hernia mesh surgery for a free case review.

Meet your Los Angeles hernia mesh lawsuit lawyer

Bejan Broukhim, personal injury lawyer at Broukhim Legal PC

Bejan Broukhim, Founder and Lead Attorney
State Bar of California, license number 183036

Bejan Broukhim brings years of California legal experience to injury and mass tort cases and personally reviews each one. He earned his J.D. at the University of West Los Angeles School of Law, served as a judicial extern in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Van Nuys Superior Court, and appeared in preliminary hearings as a certified law clerk with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office. Every case is prepared from day one as though it will go to trial.

Office: 550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390, Los Angeles, CA 90013, serving all of Los Angeles County and California. Get directions

Hernia mesh injuries we review in Los Angeles

HOW IT WORKS

Our process.

1

Consultation

A confidential first conversation. We review the facts, tell you where you stand, and set out the realistic options.

2

Strategy

Scope and fees agreed in writing, then a plan built from day one as if the matter will go to trial.

3

Resolution

We negotiate from a position of strength, and litigate aggressively when that is what your interests require.

FREE CASE REVIEW

See if a claim can be reviewed.

Takes 30 seconds. Confidential, and no obligation.

Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney-client relationship. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Mesh claims, answered plainly.

Possibly. A recall is useful evidence but it is not an element of anything. Mesh can be defective in design, defective in manufacture, or inadequately labelled without ever being recalled, and a recall does not by itself prove that a particular product caused a particular injury. The analysis runs on the mesh, the injury, the timing and the records either way.

Most people do not, and it is recoverable. The operative report almost always names the product and the manufacturer, and hospitals keep implant logs and product stickers. If you were given an implant card, bring it. If not, the records request will find it. This is not a reason to decide you have no claim.

Not necessarily. Mesh injuries frequently surface long after the original repair, and California’s discovery rules can start the clock from when the injury was identified and its connection to the mesh was or reasonably should have been discovered, rather than from the implantation. A single date cannot be given honestly, so have yours assessed against your records.

It turns on what the mesh did and what the records show. The claims most often reviewed involve revision or explant surgery, bowel adhesion or obstruction, a recurrence attributed to the mesh, persistent infection, or chronic pain documented over time with imaging to match. The original operative report naming the product and its manufacturer is the starting document, and the hospital holds it even when you do not. Chronic pain without a second operation can still be reviewed. The first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation, and the scope of the work and the fees are agreed in writing before anything starts.

Still worth a review. Revision surgery makes a claim easier to prove because it generates records and sometimes preserves the device, but documented chronic pain, imaging showing a mesh problem and a treating surgeon’s opinion can support a claim without a second operation. Get the imaging and the notes in front of someone.

Worth finding out quickly. Hospitals sometimes retain explanted mesh, and the device itself can be the single most valuable piece of evidence in the case. A written request asking the hospital to preserve it should go out early, because retention policies vary and nothing is kept indefinitely.

You will be asked for the specifics: the repair date and hospital, the surgeon, the mesh as far as you know it, any revision surgery, and authorisation to collect your records. Those records are reviewed, including the operative reports that identify the product, and you are told candidly whether the claim proceeds. If it does, it is filed, and where a coordinated proceeding exists it joins that.

General information about California law, not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by reading it. Deadlines and outcomes turn on the facts of your own matter, so have yours reviewed. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.

READY TO BEGIN?

Talk to Bejan Broukhim.

Stand up to corporate negligence. Contact the firm’s mass tort team for a free, confidential case evaluation.

FREE CONSULTATION

Tell us about your matter.

A short, confidential review. We will tell you plainly whether there is something worth pursuing.

Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney–client relationship.