A Paragard IUD that broke during removal, reviewed from a downtown Los Angeles office by attorney Bejan Broukhim.
If a Paragard IUD broke during removal and left a piece behind, you may need a Paragard lawyer in Los Angeles who will read the removal records, trace what followed and bring the claim against the manufacturer. Broukhim Legal PC reviews Paragard claims for people across Los Angeles County and California, and attorney Bejan Broukhim personally reviews each matter.
On this page: Key takeaways · Why choose Broukhim Legal PC · Who may have a Paragard claim · What Paragard lawsuits allege · Records to gather · Deadlines to file · What compensation may be sought · What a Paragard lawyer costs · Mass tort claims across Los Angeles County
Paragard is the copper intrauterine device. It is non-hormonal, it can stay in place for years, and for most people it is removed without incident. These claims are about the ones that were not: devices whose plastic arms snapped during removal and left a piece behind. A review is worth doing if your removal involved any of the following:
Many women left the appointment thinking nothing had happened, because they were told a small piece had broken off and would pass on its own. That comment, made in passing and often in English, is why these cases are frequently identified years later.
The device is a small T-shaped frame of polyethylene wound with copper wire. The allegation is that the frame can become brittle while it sits in the body, that the arms can fracture under the ordinary force used to remove it, and that neither patients nor clinicians were adequately warned. The manufacturers named in these cases include Teva and CooperSurgical. A claim generally alleges one of three things, and these are allegations to be proved, not assumptions:
These claims are usually brought against the manufacturer, on the basis that the device itself was prone to fracture, not on the basis that the clinician did anything wrong. If the records suggested a clinical error you would be told, because that is a different kind of case with different rules and a different deadline. Under California’s pure comparative fault rule, partial fault reduces a recovery and does not bar it, and where a company acted with malice, oppression or fraud, Civil Code section 3294 allows punitive damages.
Whether a retained fragment was ever recovered matters, and so does whether it is still in place. We request the records for you, in Spanish if you prefer, at no cost up front.
California allows two years from the injury for most personal injury claims, under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1, usually running from the failed removal. Where a retained fragment was only identified later, the delayed discovery rule can start the two years from when the injury and its likely cause were, or should have been, discovered. If a public entity such as a county clinic was involved, a written claim generally has to be presented within six months under Government Code section 911.2, and that shorter deadline governs. Have your dates assessed against the actual records rather than assuming either way.
No outcome can be promised, and the value of a claim cannot be known before the medical picture is clear. This is not a class action. Each claim stays separate, built on that person’s own device, removal and outcome. Where a coordinated proceeding exists, a filed claim joins it.
No fee unless there is a recovery. Broukhim Legal PC takes injury and mass tort matters on a contingency fee, so there is nothing to pay up front and the fee is paid out of what is recovered. If nothing is recovered, no fee is owed. The fee agreement is put in writing and signed before any work starts, as Business and Professions Code section 6147 requires, and the costs of running the case are explained in that same agreement. Your first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation.
Broukhim Legal PC takes mass tort claims for clients throughout Los Angeles County from its office at 550 S Hill Street in downtown Los Angeles. These cases are consolidated in federal or state court rather than heard locally, so where you live does not limit the claim. This sits alongside our other implant work, including hernia mesh, port catheters and other medical devices. See all mass torts we review, or choose your city:
Personal injury lawyer in Santa Clarita
Personal injury lawyer in Long Beach
Personal injury lawyer in Pasadena
Personal injury lawyer in Glendale
Personal injury lawyer in Burbank
Personal injury lawyer in Torrance
Personal injury lawyer in Inglewood
Personal injury lawyer in Pomona
Personal injury lawyer in Downey
Personal injury lawyer in Norwalk
Personal injury lawyer in El Monte
Personal injury lawyer in Santa Monica
Personal injury lawyer in West Covina
See all locations we serve, or tell us about your removal for a free case review.

Bejan Broukhim, Founder and Lead Attorney
State Bar of California, license number 183036
Bejan Broukhim brings years of California legal experience to injury and mass tort cases and personally reviews each one. He earned his J.D. at the University of West Los Angeles School of Law, served as a judicial extern in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Van Nuys Superior Court, and appeared in preliminary hearings as a certified law clerk with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office. Every case is prepared from day one as though it will go to trial.
Office: 550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390, Los Angeles, CA 90013, serving all of Los Angeles County and California. Get directions
A confidential first conversation. We review the facts, tell you where you stand, and set out the realistic options.
Scope and fees agreed in writing, then a plan built from day one as if the matter will go to trial.
We negotiate from a position of strength, and litigate aggressively when that is what your interests require.
Takes 30 seconds. Confidential, and no obligation.
Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney-client relationship. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.
Possibly. A fragment retrieved in the same appointment is a better outcome than most, but it still means an unplanned procedure, and a review looks at what it involved, whether anaesthetic was needed, and what followed. A short answer cannot be given without the notes.
Worth checking the rest of the file. Breakage sometimes appears first in an imaging report, in the operative report for a later procedure, or in a referral letter rather than in the removal note itself. The records request looks across all of it, not just the one page.
California allows two years from the injury for most personal injury claims under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1, usually running from the failed removal, with California’s discovery rules applying where a retained fragment was only identified later. Have yours assessed against the actual dates rather than assuming either way.
The question is what happened at removal. These claims generally involve a device that fractured on the way out, a fragment left behind, and the imaging, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy or further surgery needed to deal with it. The insertion note, the removal note, the imaging and the operative report for any retrieval procedure are what settle it, and breakage is sometimes recorded somewhere other than the removal note. The claim runs against the manufacturer rather than against your clinician. The first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation, and the scope of the work and the fees are agreed in writing before anything starts.
A recall is not the test. A device can be defective in design, defective in manufacture, or inadequately labelled without ever being recalled, and a recall would not by itself prove that your device caused your injury. The analysis runs on the device, the removal, the timing and the records either way.
Usually not. These claims are brought against the manufacturer on the basis that the device itself was prone to fracture, not on the basis that the clinician did anything wrong. If the records suggested a clinical error you would be told, because that is a different kind of case with different rules and a different deadline.
You will be asked for the specifics: roughly when the device was inserted and removed, where, what happened at the removal, any procedure that followed, and authorisation to collect your records. Those records are reviewed and you are told candidly whether the claim proceeds. If it does, it is filed, and where a coordinated proceeding exists it joins that.
General information about California law, not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by reading it. Deadlines and outcomes turn on the facts of your own matter, so have yours reviewed. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.
Stand up to corporate negligence. Contact the firm’s mass tort team for a free, confidential case evaluation.
Broukhim Legal PC. Personal injury and mass tort litigation, led by Bejan Broukhim from downtown Los Angeles.
Our Firm
Bejan Broukhim
FAQ
Insights
Contact
Broukhim Legal PC
550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM PT
Attorney advertising. This website is an advertisement by Broukhim Legal PC, 550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390, Los Angeles, CA 90013. The attorney responsible for its content is Bejan Broukhim, State Bar of California license number 183036, licensed in California. The information on this website is general information, not legal advice, and is no substitute for advice about your own situation. Contacting the firm or submitting a form does not create an attorney-client relationship, so please do not send confidential information until the firm has agreed in writing to represent you. Every case is different, and no particular result is promised or implied. Contingency fees and costs: no attorney fee is charged unless there is a recovery. Case costs, such as filing fees, records and expert witness fees, are separate from the fee, and whether you would be responsible for them if there is no recovery is set out in the written fee agreement you review before signing. With your written consent, the firm may associate with or refer your matter to another law firm; any division of fees is disclosed to you in writing and does not increase the total fee. Images on this website are illustrative and, other than Bejan Broukhim, do not depict clients or lawyers of the firm. If a medication or medical device is mentioned on this website, do not stop taking it or have it removed without first talking to your doctor.
© 2026 Broukhim Legal PC. All rights reserved. · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
A short, confidential review. We will tell you plainly whether there is something worth pursuing.
Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney–client relationship.