Implant and device claims, reviewed from a downtown Los Angeles office by attorney Bejan Broukhim.
If a medical device or implant failed and you needed a second operation, you may want a medical device lawyer in Los Angeles who will identify exactly what was implanted, work out how the device reached the market and build the claim from your own records. Broukhim Legal PC reviews defective medical device claims for people across Los Angeles County and California, and attorney Bejan Broukhim personally reviews each matter.
On this page: Key takeaways · Why choose Broukhim Legal PC · Who may have a claim · What device lawsuits allege · Why some claims are blocked · Records to gather · Deadlines to file · What compensation may be sought · What a medical device lawyer costs · Mass tort claims across Los Angeles County
The most common reason people do not ask about a device claim is that their device was never recalled. That belief is wrong, and it costs them. A recall is not an element of anything, and a recall does not by itself prove that a particular device caused a particular injury. The analysis runs on the device, the injury, the timing and the medical records either way.
A review is worth doing if you had an implant or device and something went wrong. The clearest signal is an unplanned second operation to fix or remove it. We review claims involving:
A device claim generally alleges one of three things. These are allegations to be proved, not assumptions:
Under California’s pure comparative fault rule, partial fault on the patient’s side reduces a recovery and does not bar it. Where a company acted with malice, oppression or fraud, Civil Code section 3294 allows punitive damages.
Because of federal preemption. Many implants and much medical equipment reached the market through the FDA’s 510(k) pathway, which allows a device to be sold by showing it resembles one already on the market, without new clinical studies. Devices cleared that way generally do not carry a preemption problem.
Devices approved through the FDA’s most rigorous pathway can attract the argument that state law claims are blocked by federal regulation. In those cases the road is harder. Which route a device went through is not something a patient can be expected to know, and establishing it is part of the review.
The records that matter are specific:
If you do not know the brand, the records request will find it. That is not a reason to decide you have no claim.
The general rule is two years from injury to file a personal injury lawsuit, under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1. Property damage has three years under section 338. Device cases are different in practice, because the injury often appears long after the implant. Under the delayed discovery rule, the two years can run from when the injury and its likely connection to the device were, or should have been, discovered, which is frequently much later than the implantation.
If a public entity such as a county hospital was involved in your care, a written claim generally has to be presented within six months under Government Code section 911.2, and that shorter deadline governs. A single date cannot be given honestly without your records, so have yours assessed early rather than assuming time is on your side.
No outcome can be promised, and the value of a claim cannot be known before the medical picture and the device history are clear. It turns on the injury, the treatment still to come, the device involved and the evidence.
This is not a class action. Each claim stays separate, built on that person’s own device, surgery and outcome. Where a coordinated proceeding exists for a device, a filed claim joins it.
No fee unless there is a recovery. Broukhim Legal PC takes injury and mass tort matters on a contingency fee, so there is nothing to pay up front and the fee is paid out of what is recovered. If nothing is recovered, no fee is owed. The fee agreement is put in writing and signed before any work starts, as Business and Professions Code section 6147 requires, and the costs of running the case are explained in that same agreement rather than left to the end. Your first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation.
Broukhim Legal PC takes mass tort claims for clients throughout Los Angeles County from its office at 550 S Hill Street in downtown Los Angeles. These cases are consolidated in federal or state court rather than heard locally, so where you live does not limit the claim. See our mass tort practice for the other claims we review, and the city pages below for the local team:
Personal injury lawyer in Santa Clarita
Personal injury lawyer in Long Beach
Personal injury lawyer in Pasadena
Personal injury lawyer in Glendale
Personal injury lawyer in Burbank
Personal injury lawyer in Torrance
Personal injury lawyer in Inglewood
Personal injury lawyer in Pomona
Personal injury lawyer in Downey
Personal injury lawyer in Norwalk
Personal injury lawyer in El Monte
Personal injury lawyer in Santa Monica
Personal injury lawyer in West Covina
See all locations we serve, or tell us about your device for a free case review.

Bejan Broukhim, Founder and Lead Attorney
State Bar of California, license number 183036
Bejan Broukhim brings years of California legal experience to injury and mass tort cases and personally reviews each one. He earned his J.D. at the University of West Los Angeles School of Law, served as a judicial extern in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Van Nuys Superior Court, and appeared in preliminary hearings as a certified law clerk with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office. Every case is prepared from day one as though it will go to trial.
Office: 550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390, Los Angeles, CA 90013, serving all of Los Angeles County and California. Get directions
A confidential first conversation. We review the facts, tell you where you stand, and set out the realistic options.
Scope and fees agreed in writing, then a plan built from day one as if the matter will go to trial.
We negotiate from a position of strength, and litigate aggressively when that is what your interests require.
Takes 30 seconds. Confidential, and no obligation.
Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney-client relationship. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.
Possibly. A recall is useful evidence but it is not an element of anything. A device can be defective in design, defective in manufacture, or inadequately labelled without ever being recalled, and a recall does not by itself prove that a particular device caused a particular injury. The analysis runs on the device, the injury, the timing and the records either way.
Most people do not, and it is recoverable. The operative report almost always names the device and the manufacturer, and hospitals keep implant logs. If you were given an implant card, bring it. If not, the records request will find it. This is not a reason to decide you have no claim.
It depends on when the injury was identified and when the connection to the device was or reasonably should have been discovered, which in device cases is frequently much later than the implantation. California’s discovery rules matter here. A single date cannot be given honestly, so have it assessed against your own records.
The review starts with three documents: the operative report that names the device and its manufacturer, the records of any revision or removal surgery, and the treatment notes describing what went wrong. From those it is possible to say which proceeding, if any, the device belongs to, and whether a preemption argument is likely to be raised. A device that was never recalled can still support a claim, and not knowing the brand is not a barrier, because the records carry it. The first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation, and the scope of the work and the fees are agreed in writing before anything starts.
Because of federal preemption. Devices approved through the FDA’s most rigorous pathway can attract an argument that state law claims are blocked by federal regulation. Devices cleared through the lighter pathway, which is the majority, generally do not carry that problem. Which route a given device went through is not something a patient could be expected to know, and establishing it is part of the review.
Worth finding out quickly. Hospitals sometimes retain explanted devices, and the device itself can be the single most valuable piece of evidence in the case. A written request asking the hospital to preserve it should go out early, because retention policies vary and nothing is kept indefinitely.
You will be asked for the specifics: the device as far as you know it, the implanting surgeon and hospital, the dates, any revision surgery, and authorisation to collect your records. Those records are reviewed, including the operative report that identifies the device, and you are told candidly whether the claim proceeds. If it does, it is filed, and where a coordinated proceeding exists it joins that.
General information about California law, not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by reading it. Deadlines and outcomes turn on the facts of your own matter, so have yours reviewed. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.
Stand up to corporate negligence. Contact the firm’s mass tort team for a free, confidential case evaluation.
Broukhim Legal PC. Personal injury and mass tort litigation, led by Bejan Broukhim from downtown Los Angeles.
Our Firm
Bejan Broukhim
FAQ
Insights
Contact
Broukhim Legal PC
550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM PT
Attorney advertising. This website is an advertisement by Broukhim Legal PC, 550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390, Los Angeles, CA 90013. The attorney responsible for its content is Bejan Broukhim, State Bar of California license number 183036, licensed in California. The information on this website is general information, not legal advice, and is no substitute for advice about your own situation. Contacting the firm or submitting a form does not create an attorney-client relationship, so please do not send confidential information until the firm has agreed in writing to represent you. Every case is different, and no particular result is promised or implied. Contingency fees and costs: no attorney fee is charged unless there is a recovery. Case costs, such as filing fees, records and expert witness fees, are separate from the fee, and whether you would be responsible for them if there is no recovery is set out in the written fee agreement you review before signing. With your written consent, the firm may associate with or refer your matter to another law firm; any division of fees is disclosed to you in writing and does not increase the total fee. Images on this website are illustrative and, other than Bejan Broukhim, do not depict clients or lawyers of the firm. If a medication or medical device is mentioned on this website, do not stop taking it or have it removed without first talking to your doctor.
© 2026 Broukhim Legal PC. All rights reserved. · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
A short, confidential review. We will tell you plainly whether there is something worth pursuing.
Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney–client relationship.