Hernia mesh failure and revision surgery, reviewed from a downtown Los Angeles office by attorney Bejan Broukhim.
If a hernia repair had to be redone, or the mesh had to be taken out, you may want a hernia mesh lawyer in Los Angeles to review your records. Broukhim Legal PC reviews hernia mesh claims for people across Los Angeles County and California, and attorney Bejan Broukhim personally reviews each case.
On this page: Key takeaways · Why choose Broukhim Legal PC · Who may have a claim · What the lawsuits allege · Records to gather · Deadlines to file · What compensation may be sought · What a hernia mesh lawyer costs · Hernia mesh claims across Los Angeles
The question to start with is whether the repair failed or caused new problems. People who may be worth reviewing include those who:
Most people hold back because their mesh was never recalled, and that is the wrong test. Almost nobody knows which mesh was used, which is normal: it is not information handed to the patient. The hospital has it in the operative report and the implant record, with brand, model and lot number.
A recall is not an element of any claim. The allegations commonly concern the material shrinking, hardening, folding, migrating, adhering to the bowel, becoming infected or degrading inside the body. A claim generally alleges one or more of three things:
Those are allegations to be proved, not assumptions. Product claims also work differently from a negligence claim, because the focus is on the product and what the manufacturer knew, not on a single mistake in the operating room.
The records that decide these cases are specific and usually obtainable. With a signed authorization, Broukhim Legal PC requests them for you, so that first step is not left to you:
If the original surgery was many years ago, or in another country, the firm still reviews what can be obtained. If the hernia came from lifting at work and workers’ compensation paid for the surgery, a claim against the mesh manufacturer is still a separate path.
An injury lawsuit generally must be filed within two years under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1. Timing matters more here than in most claims, because the injury often appears years after the original repair. For injuries that appear later, the two years can run from when the injury and its likely cause were, or should have been, discovered. If you were told for years that your pain was normal, that can matter to the date. Because those rules are applied to the actual dates in your file and not to a rule of thumb, have your dates reviewed early rather than assuming time has run out.
No result can be promised, and what a claim is worth depends on the injury, the treatment and the proof. The categories of damages that may be sought include:
No fee unless there is a recovery. Broukhim Legal PC takes hernia mesh cases on a contingency fee, so there is nothing to pay up front and the fee is paid out of what is recovered. If nothing is recovered, no fee is owed. The fee agreement is put in writing and signed before any work starts, as California law requires, and it also explains how the costs of running the case are handled. Your first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation.
These cases are consolidated in federal or state court rather than heard locally, so where you live does not limit the claim. Broukhim Legal PC reviews them from its office at 550 S Hill Street in downtown Los Angeles. This is one of several implant claims the firm handles: port catheters, copper IUDs and other medical devices are reviewed on the same basis.
Mass tort claims are handled for clients across Los Angeles County and California, and where you live does not limit a claim that is part of consolidated litigation. Browse all mass tort cases we review or the locations we serve, or tell us about your hernia mesh surgery for a free case review.

Bejan Broukhim, Founder and Lead Attorney
State Bar of California, license number 183036
Bejan Broukhim brings years of California legal experience to injury and mass tort cases and personally reviews each one. He earned his J.D. at the University of West Los Angeles School of Law, served as a judicial extern in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and the Van Nuys Superior Court, and appeared in preliminary hearings as a certified law clerk with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office. Every case is prepared from day one as though it will go to trial.
Office: 550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390, Los Angeles, CA 90013, serving all of Los Angeles County and California. Get directions
A confidential first conversation. We review the facts, tell you where you stand, and set out the realistic options.
Scope and fees agreed in writing, then a plan built from day one as if the matter will go to trial.
We negotiate from a position of strength, and litigate aggressively when that is what your interests require.
Takes 30 seconds. Confidential, and no obligation.
Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney-client relationship. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.
Possibly. A recall is useful evidence but it is not an element of anything. Mesh can be defective in design, defective in manufacture, or inadequately labelled without ever being recalled, and a recall does not by itself prove that a particular product caused a particular injury. The analysis runs on the mesh, the injury, the timing and the records either way.
Most people do not, and it is recoverable. The operative report almost always names the product and the manufacturer, and hospitals keep implant logs and product stickers. If you were given an implant card, bring it. If not, the records request will find it. This is not a reason to decide you have no claim.
Not necessarily. Mesh injuries frequently surface long after the original repair, and California’s discovery rules can start the clock from when the injury was identified and its connection to the mesh was or reasonably should have been discovered, rather than from the implantation. A single date cannot be given honestly, so have yours assessed against your records.
It turns on what the mesh did and what the records show. The claims most often reviewed involve revision or explant surgery, bowel adhesion or obstruction, a recurrence attributed to the mesh, persistent infection, or chronic pain documented over time with imaging to match. The original operative report naming the product and its manufacturer is the starting document, and the hospital holds it even when you do not. Chronic pain without a second operation can still be reviewed. The first conversation is free, confidential and carries no obligation, and the scope of the work and the fees are agreed in writing before anything starts.
Still worth a review. Revision surgery makes a claim easier to prove because it generates records and sometimes preserves the device, but documented chronic pain, imaging showing a mesh problem and a treating surgeon’s opinion can support a claim without a second operation. Get the imaging and the notes in front of someone.
Worth finding out quickly. Hospitals sometimes retain explanted mesh, and the device itself can be the single most valuable piece of evidence in the case. A written request asking the hospital to preserve it should go out early, because retention policies vary and nothing is kept indefinitely.
You will be asked for the specifics: the repair date and hospital, the surgeon, the mesh as far as you know it, any revision surgery, and authorisation to collect your records. Those records are reviewed, including the operative reports that identify the product, and you are told candidly whether the claim proceeds. If it does, it is filed, and where a coordinated proceeding exists it joins that.
General information about California law, not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by reading it. Deadlines and outcomes turn on the facts of your own matter, so have yours reviewed. By submitting, you agree that Broukhim Legal PC may contact you about your inquiry by phone, text or email. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out of texts. Consent is not a condition of hiring the firm.
Stand up to corporate negligence. Contact the firm’s mass tort team for a free, confidential case evaluation.
Broukhim Legal PC. Personal injury and mass tort litigation, led by Bejan Broukhim from downtown Los Angeles.
Our Firm
Bejan Broukhim
FAQ
Insights
Contact
Broukhim Legal PC
550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM PT
Attorney advertising. This website is an advertisement by Broukhim Legal PC, 550 S Hill Street, Suite 1390, Los Angeles, CA 90013. The attorney responsible for its content is Bejan Broukhim, State Bar of California license number 183036, licensed in California. The information on this website is general information, not legal advice, and is no substitute for advice about your own situation. Contacting the firm or submitting a form does not create an attorney-client relationship, so please do not send confidential information until the firm has agreed in writing to represent you. Every case is different, and no particular result is promised or implied. Contingency fees and costs: no attorney fee is charged unless there is a recovery. Case costs, such as filing fees, records and expert witness fees, are separate from the fee, and whether you would be responsible for them if there is no recovery is set out in the written fee agreement you review before signing. With your written consent, the firm may associate with or refer your matter to another law firm; any division of fees is disclosed to you in writing and does not increase the total fee. Images on this website are illustrative and, other than Bejan Broukhim, do not depict clients or lawyers of the firm. If a medication or medical device is mentioned on this website, do not stop taking it or have it removed without first talking to your doctor.
© 2026 Broukhim Legal PC. All rights reserved. · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
A short, confidential review. We will tell you plainly whether there is something worth pursuing.
Confidential. No obligation. Submitting does not create an attorney–client relationship.